EMOTIONAL SANITY AND DEMOCRACY

Yahoo News

An Alliance of Autocracies? China Wants to Lead a New World Order.

 «Biden made that clear in his first presidential news conference Thursday, presenting a foreign policy based on geopolitical competition between governance models. He compared Xi to Russian President Vladimir Putin, «who thinks that autocracy is the wave of the future and democracy can’t function» in «an ever-complex world.» 

Absolutely correct, brother; but it is not a matter of «complexity.» The problem is that democracy requires a level of emotional-mental sanity that you sorely lack with your narcissistic craving for god-like POWER. Autocracy suits you much better. MASS SHOOTINGS, anyone in the freest democracy? The Uighurs in China? Mr. Alexei Navalny in Russia? Currently being assassinated for a second time?

There is a tug of war going on between those promoting»democracy» (male-mind democracies never existed. At best we are talking about proto-democracies. The foundational premise of male-mind thinking: «two gods is a crowd. If there is only ONE god it is ME» de facto precludes democracy) and those betting that the best solution is autocracy. -Autocrats -given the increasing problems in the reigning democracy, the U.S.A, is gaining legitimacy to the point that they no longer have to hide because, yes, they have in their favour a twisted point. They can more efficiently enforce peace («quietness?») through repression.

Given their profound male-mind distortions their consequent god-like aspirations and attitudes, autocracy meshes better with the male mind’s current state of insanity than democracy does. And some «democrats» be it of the extreme right or extreme left are taking note!

It comes more naturally to men, and it is more manageable and, therefore, in a sense, more «efficient»-in appearance. Just give an order, punish disagreements, and it will be followed through without questions or discussions -and much less opposition! Novichok poison is easier to administer and more efficient-convincing perhaps than to pass a just law. Certainly more intimidating! And certainly, much easier to deny…

Democratic Autocracy (if such a thing exists) was, perhaps in essence, Mr. Donald Trump’s idea for American Democracy.

The Chinese do not see a problem with such a retrograde move towards autocracy because they cultivate a collective sense of self that solves disagreement not with debate but through authoritarian repression. As a «we-self» (the party?), their collective sense of self sees nothing wrong with that. On the contrary, it becomes convenient because it makes rigid vertical hierarchy legitimate and «natural.» And since we all are «one» it is easier to agree-manage.

Thus, pragmatic efficiency wins the day at the cost of suppressing the development of the human self. Which, as it is not cashable, comoditaceable or tangible it does not exist anyway?

The Americans have followed a different (opposite?) type of sociopsychology, developing to the max the individual self by giving it «freedom» (not the real thing, of course). For instance, they entrust their citizens with easy access to lethal weapons and billions of dollars in their bank accounts earned with the sweat of other’s brows. At the same time, their societies reek with poverty, grotesque inequalities and even hunger.

Let the boys be boys? Mass shootings anyone?

Crazy enough?

How come they are not easily winning (in spite, in some instances, of near-fascist policing tactics) and have so many serious problems that permit repressive regimes to challenge them?

Well, I have touched upon this paradox before. It is a matter of «sanity.»

Since the Separation, the human mind is de facto (not yet de Jury) an insane, narcissistically deranged form of intelligence. The proof is all over human history -from which we seem unable to learn anything that would prejudice the power of the reigning male-mind. And we have converted cultures into repressive muzzles of our emotional selves because feelings get on the way to the macho way of governing.

IN BRIEF: WE ARE SOMEWHAT «LOGICAL» BUT THOUGHROLY EMOTIONALLY INSANE! And spiritual morons.

The human mind lacks the necessary sanity to produce sane offspring. If you permit here a bit of vulgarity for a moment; the logic «you cannot make chicken soup out of chicken shit» prevails -times over.

The future: Do you know of any instance where an insane entity declared itself insane? We have no clue of our intrinsic gross abnormality!

And («biological-only») psychiatry, as part of the system, does not help at all!

What is the answer?

The curse of male-mind «cultures» living outside of what is true is that they are incapable to generate meaning. Something that it is sorely missing in male-mind-created societies and without it the human self does not function properly (Warning: Money will not do! ) -leading to despair and sometimes suicide. -Unless, in your need to believe holding onto something, like becoming a party member or some other crazy refuge! A sect? A cult? The self needs meaning to survive!

Yes, we need to believe in something to balance our inner emptiness. Don’t we? Our selves are not autonomous entities -as men like to think. And being part of something, preferably fanatic like «ultra-right,» «ultra-left,» a «Party» -or whatever -becomes exceedingly handy. – Politicians know how to cash in our need to belong and believe to counteract our emptiness. To cash in the emptiness left by having declared that «God is dead!» -Sorry brother I have news for you: If you search deep enough in yourself -as, for instance, St. John of the Cross did, you will find Him:).

*************************

Yahoo News